Jaikoz drag and drop1/9/2023 However, I think with each version there are potential pitfalls for using the application. This does not mean that iTunes is crapware as some people blindly claim. has turned what was once a lightweight into something of a monstrosity. Its deep integration into apps, the music store, etc. Now there are lots of complaints, including myself, on how iTunes has become bloatware. In general, it’s worked out well given my desire to use smart playlists in its organization. This allows me the ability to jump to any of my lists at will and deposit them into a crate if needed. I leverage iTunes in Serato is I treat all my iTunes lists as static. But the shortcomings aside, it’s very nice to have your iTunes organization inside of Serato. Once there, you lack functionality inside an iTunes playlist or smart playlist like sorting. In Serato loading, a large library has quite a bit of time in loading. The popularity of iTunes forced Serato (and Traktor) to have an option to read off the iTunes library file. But for a lot of people with growing databases of music, they put their hands in the care of iTunes. Some segregate music by genres, some want far more identifying information at the file level like artist – track – year – bpm, or some other iteration. Everyone has their own personal methodology for file naming and folder creation. For many purists and manual music managers, this is not an option to even consider. And with iTunes you can, if you choose, to organize the files by artist/album/track # – track. You can simply drag and drop your files into the application. And for a number of DJs it’s a defacto music manager. But it caught like wildfire but it quickly became THE player. It would still take another 18 months before a Windows version release would come out. Sure a v1.0 release needs some refinement, but it was pretty solid. Here comes iTunes with a pretty slick interface and at the time zero bloat. And with that, manual management of your folders was the only way. Prior to that WinAmp was one of the most popular consumer players out there. It’s hard to believe that iTunes has been around since January 2001. I also utilize the Jaikoz tagging application to help fill in a lot of the secondary tag information. So in this article, I am going to compare iTunes 12.1 versus Serato DJ 1.7.5 and SSL 2.5 using my MacBook Pro and OS-X Yosemite 10.10.3. This is purely about managing a library of music for DJ use. Backups are crucial people!Īlso before anyone thinks I am advocating iTunes for DJ playback… nope. I was able to revert back to 12.1 and recovered my iTunes playlist. I had a minor issue where it updated and I could not add tracks. Some even totally lost their libraries into the ether. A lot of DJs got very upset at the iTunes 12.2 update and had some of their libraries get scrambled up. I wrote up a detailed blog on how to leverage nested smart playlists to create powerful final queries for music. Admitting Biasīefore I throw some observations into this topic I want to make it clear that I have been an iTunes advocate in the past to manage music files. For others, a level of automation is very refreshing to help make snap decisions. For some DJs a totally manual method of management is the only way. So what makes great music management software? Well, this depends on the user and their workflow, which is why this is such a debated issue. But when you compare iTunes vs Serato to manage music directly, well this hotly debated argument deserves a deep dive look into its underpinnings. There is a lot of debating going on with the recent iTunes 12.2 release. The DJ library is one of the most critical tools and has to fulfill the needs of the user.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |